Lightning Jump Algorithm Update

of 12

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
PDF
12 pages
0 downs
3 views
Share
Description
C. Schultz, W. Petersen, L. Carey GLM Science Meeting 12/01/10. Lightning Jump Algorithm Update. Where we left you in ’09. Thunderstorm breakdown: North Alabama – 83 storms Washington D.C. – 2 storms Houston TX – 13 storms Dallas – 9 storms.
Transcript
C. Schultz, W. Petersen, L. CareyGLM Science Meeting12/01/10Lightning Jump Algorithm UpdateWhere we left you in ’09Thunderstorm breakdown:North Alabama – 83 stormsWashington D.C. – 2 stormsHouston TX – 13 stormsDallas – 9 storms
  • Six separate lightning jump configurations tested
  • Case study expansion:
  • 107 T-storms analyzed
  • 38 severe
  • 69 non-severe
  • The “2σ” configuration yielded best results
  • POD beats NWS performance statistics (80-90%);
  • FAR even better i.e.,15% lower (Barnes et al. 2007)
  • Caveat: Large difference in sample sizes, more cases are needed to finalize result.
  • M.S. Thesis completed and study accepted to JAMC (Schultz, Petersen, Carey 2009); forms the conceptual basis of the lightning jump ATBD
  • Case Expansion
  • Since, we’ve expanded to 638 thunderstorms
  • Primarily from N. Alabama (537)
  • Also included
  • Washington D.C. (49 and counting)
  • Oklahoma (30 and counting)
  • STEPS (22)
  • Regional expansion has proven robust
  • POD: 82%, FAR 35%, avg. lead time: 22 mins.
  • DC LMA Results
  • 14 of 15 missed events by the 2σ algorithm were 1 tree knocked down
  • 64 severe events total for the DC sample.
  • Lightning jumps observed before almost every hail and tornado case
  • 1 tornado missed in entire sample (remnants of TS Nicole)
  • Skill Scores, 2σ, DC LMA region Example, tornadic storm July 16, 2007Proving the Utility of Total Lightning
  • Examined total and CG rates in 30 thunderstorms in four regions of country
  • Total lightning trends outperform CG lightning trends
  • Schultz et al., WAF, accepted, editing
  • Low topped/cold season and tropical environments
  • 40% of misses in these environments.
  • Can we still provide utility by tailoring algorithm?
  • Answer:
  • Tropical maybe, cold/low topped, tougher.
  • Time-height plot of reflectivity (top) and total flash rate (bot) for an EF-1 producing tornadic storm on March 25, 2010. Tornado touchdown time ~2240 UTC.Cold Season/Low Topped
  • Average peak flash rates:
  • Severe 11.53 flashes min-1, all have at least 1 flash
  • Non Severe: 6.60 flashes min-1
  • Some separation occurs at 6 flashes min-1
  • Landfalling Tropical Systems
  • Analyzed 8 landfalling TC’s within range of an LMA/LDAR
  • Average Peak Flash Rates
  • Severe: 6.60 flashes min-1, 5 storms w/o any flashes
  • w/o no flash storms, avg. flash rate 8.90 flashes min-1
  • Non Severe 6.35 flashes min-1
  • 0.29 flashes min-1 if non severe from Charley are removed
  • CharleySB CAPE18Z August 13, 20040-3 km Helicity18Z August 13, 2004No tornado, but increases in rotation observedTotal Flash Rate (flashes min-1)Total Flash Rate (flashes min-1)100 km from radarSB CAPE 18Z Sept. 25, 2005Purple line – total flash rate (flashes min-1)Contours - Merged Azimuthal Shear, Smith and Elmore (2004), using WDSS-II0-3 km Helicity 18Z Sept. 25, 2005100 km from radarOther “misses”
  • e.g., Feb 6, 2008 EF-4 tornado producing storm, 1117 UTC
  • Downward trend in total lightning masks any small pulses in electrical activity.
  • 230 severe408 non severeExamining Environments
  • Goal: Using commonly used environmental parameters to determine when total lightning will be of most use.
  • Other parameters; temp, theta, theta-e, RH, e,es, r,rvs, etc. Future Work
  • Incorporate other satellite/radar products
  • Have robust satellite dataset from GOES-O/P tests
  • In what capacity does high temporal satellite and total lightning information benefit nowcasting of storm growth and decay?
  • Reflectivity/rotation comparisons
  • Testing of algorithm in real-time this summer at Redstone and White Sands
  • Work the GLM lightning proxy along with the proxy in the cell tracking framework.
  • Related Search
    We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks