Mat Chapter 4

of 10

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
PDF
10 pages
0 downs
9 views
Share
Description
Mat Chapter 4
Tags
Transcript
  INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES 1.0INTRODUCTION A Civil Engineering Designer has to ensure that the structures and facilities he designsare (i fit for their !ur!ose (ii safe and (iii econo ical and dura#le$ Thus safet% is oneof the !ara ount res!onsi#ilities of the designer$ &o'ever it is difficult to assess at thedesign stage ho' safe a !ro!osed design 'ill actuall% #e ) consistent 'ith econo %$There is in fact a great deal of uncertaint% a#out the an% factors 'hich influence #othsafet% and econo %$ *irstl% there is a natural varia#ilit% in the aterial strengths andsecondl% it is i !ossi#le to !redict the loading 'hich a structure (e$g$ a #uilding a% #esu#+ected to on a future occasion$ Thus uncertainties affecting the safet% of a structureare due to ã uncertaint% a#out loading ã uncertaint% a#out aterial strength and ã uncertaint% a#out structural di ensions and #ehaviour$These uncertainties together a,e it i !ossi#le for a designer to guarantee that astructure 'ill #e a#solutel% safe$ All that the designer could ensure is that the ris, of failure is e-tre el% s all des!ite the uncertainties$An illustration of the statistical eaning of safet% is given in *ig$ .$ Let us consider astructural co !onent (sa% a #ea  designed to carr% a given no inal load$ /ending o ents (/$M$ !roduced #% characteristic loads are first co !uted$ These are to #eco !ared 'ith the characteristic resistance or strength (R$M$ of the #ea $ /ut thecharacteristic resistance (R$M$ itself is not a fi-ed 0uantit% due to variations in aterialstrengths that ight occur #et'een no inall% sa e ele ents$ The actual resistance of these ele ents can #e e-!ected to var% as a conse0uence$ The statistical distri#ution of these e #er strengths (or resistances 'ill #e as s,etched in ( a $ Si ilarl% the variation in the a-i u loads and therefore load effects (such as #ending o ent 'hich different structural ele ents (all no inall% the sa e ight encounter intheir service life 'ould have a distri#ution sho'n in ( b $ The uncertainty here is bothdue to variability of the loads applied to the structure, and also due to the variability of the load distribution through the structure.  Thus if a !articularl% 'ea, structuralco !onent is su#+ected to a heav% load 'hich e-ceeds the strength of the structuralco !onent clearl% failure could occur$Unfortunatel% it is not !ractica#le to define the !ro#a#ilit% distri#utions of loads andstrengths as it 'ill involve hundreds of tests on sa !les of co !onents$ Nor al designcalculations are ade using a single value for each load and for each aterial !ro!ert%and a,ing a!!ro!riate safet% factor into the design calculations$ The value used ister ed as 1 Characteristic Strength or Resistance 2 or 1 Characteristic Load  2$3 Co!%right reserved Version II4 - 1   4  INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES Characteristic resistance of a material (such as Concrete or Steel) is defined as that value of resistance below which not more than a prescribed percentage of test resultsmay be epected to fall.  (*or e-a !le the characteristic %ield stress of steel is usuall%defined as that value of %ield stress #elo' 'hich not ore than 5%  of the test values a% #e e-!ected to fall$ In other 'ords this strength is e-!ected to #e e-ceeded #% 95%  of the cases$Si ilarl% the characteristic load is that value of the load, which has an accepted  probability of not being eceeded during the life span of the structure.  Characteristicload is therefore that load 'hich 'ill not #e e-ceeded 95%  of the ti e$ 2.0STANDARDISATION Most structural designs are #ased on e-!erience$ Standardisation of all designs isunli,el% 'ithin the foreseea#le future hence design rules #ased on e-!erience #eco euseful$ If a si ilar design has #een #uilt successfull% else'here there is no reasons 'h%a designer a% not consider it !rudent to follo' as!ects of design that have !rovedsuccessful and ado!t standardised design rules$ As the conse0uences of #ad design can #e catastro!hic the societ% e-!ects designers to e-!lain their design decisions$ It istherefore advantageous to use ethods of design that have !roved safe in the !ast$Standardised design ethods can hel! in co !aring alternative designs 'hile ini isingthe ris, of the chea!est design #eing less safe than the others$Most 4overn ents atte !t to ensure structural safet% through regulations and la's$Designers then atte !t to achieve a-i u econo % 'ithin the range of designs that Version II4 - 2 Curve (a) Risk of  failure  F  r  e  q  u  e  n  c  y Variation of resistance (R.M.) between nominally ientical materials !oa use in calculation tren#t$ (or resistance) use in calculationsCurve (b)Variation of maimum life time loa effects (&.M.) !ig. Statistical #eaning of Safety  !oa effects ivie by Resistance moment   INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES the regulations allo'$ *re0uentl% the !rofessions are allo'ed to regulate the selves5 inthese a cases the Regulations or Codes of $ractices  are evolved #% consultation andconsensus 'ithin the !rofession$ 3.0 ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN ASD! 6ith the develo! ent of linear elastic theories in the '9 t$  centur% the stress7strain #ehaviour of ne' aterials li,e 'rought iron 8 ild steel could #e accuratel%re!resented$ These theories ena#led indeter inate structures to #e anal%sed and thedistri#ution of #ending and shear stresses to #e co !uted correctl%$ The first attain entof %ield stress of steel 'as generall% ta,en to #e the onset of failure$ The li itations dueto non7linearit% and #uc,ling 'ere neglected$The #asic for of calculations too, the for of verif%ing that the stresses caused #% thecharacteristic loads ust #e less than an 1 allowable stress 2 'hich 'as a fraction of the%ield stress$ Thus the allo'a#le stress a% #e defined in ter s of a 1  factor of safety 9'hich re!resented a argin for overload and other un,no'n factors 'hich could #etolerated #% the structure$ The allo'a#le stress is thus directl% related to %ield stress #%the follo'ing e-!ression:In general each e #er in a structure is chec,ed for a nu #er of different co #inationsof loading$ The value of factor of safet% in ost cases is ta,en to #e around .$;<$ Man%loads var% 'ith ti e and these should #e allo'ed for$ It is unnecessaril% severe toconsider the effects of all loads acting si ultaneousl% 'ith their full design value 'hile aintaining the sa e factor of safet% or safet% factor$ Using the sa e factor of safet% or safet% factor 'hen loads act in co #ination 'ould result in unecono ic designs$A t%!ical e-a !le of a set of load co #inations is given #elo' 'hich accounts for thefact that the dead load live load and 'ind load are all unli,el% to act on the structuresi ultaneousl% at their a-i u values:(Stress due to dead load = live load > allo'a#le stress(Stress due to dead load = 'ind load > allo'a#le stress(Stress due to dead load = live load = 'ind > .$?? ti es allo'a#le stress$In !ractice there are severe li itations to this a!!roach$ These are the conse0uences of  aterial non7linearit% non7linear #ehaviour of ele ents in the !ost7#uc,led state and thea#ilit% of the steel co !onents to tolerate high theoretical elastic stresses #% %ieldinglocall% and redistri#uting the loads$ Moreover the elastic theor% does not readil% allo'for redistri#ution of loads fro one e #er to another in a staticall% indeter inatestructures$ Version II4 - 3  safetyof   Factor  stress(iel  stress )llowable  =  INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES 4.0 LIMIT STATE DESIGN An i !roved design !hiloso!h% to a,e allo'ances for the shortco ings in the  %llowable Stress &esign #  'as develo!ed in the late '9*+ @s and has #een e-tensivel%incor!orated in design standards and codes for ulated in all the develo!ed countries$Although there are an% variations #et'een !ractices ado!ted in different countries the #asic conce!t is #roadl% si ilar$ The !ro#a#ilit% of o!erating conditions not reachingfailure conditions for s the #asis of 1  Limit States &esign 2 ado!ted in all countries$1Li it States9 are the various conditions in 'hich a structure 'ould #e considered tohave failed to fulfil the !ur!ose for 'hich it 'as #uilt$ In general t'o li it states areconsidered at the design stage and these are listed in Ta#le .$ Table ' Limit States U$%i&'%e Li&i% S%'%eSer(i)e'*i$i%+ Li&i% S%'%e  Strength (%ield #uc,lingSta#ilit% against overturning and s'a%*racture due to fatigue/rittle *ractureDeflectioni#ration*atigue chec,s (including re!ara#le da age due to fatigueCorrosion ,-ltimate !imit tates are t$ose catastro/$ic states0 w$ic$ require a lar#er reliability inorer to reuce t$e /robability of its occurrence to a very low level. , erviceability !imit tate1 refers to t$e limits on acce/table /erformance of t$e structure.  Not all these li its can #e covered #% structural calculations$ *or e-a !le corrosion iscovered #% s!ecif%ing for s of !rotection (li,e !ainting and #rittle fracture is covered #% aterial s!ecifications 'hich ensure that steel is sufficientl% ductile$ ,.0 ARTIAL SAET/ ACTOR  The a+or innovation in the ne' codes is the introduction of the !artial safet% factor for at$ A t%!ical for at is descri#ed #elo':In general calculations ta,e the for of verif%ing that    2   ≤    R B Version II4 - 4
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks