The Effect of the Subject in the Psychoses

of 12

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
12 pages
3 downs
Jacques-Alain Miller desenvolve a abordagem lacaniana da psicose.
  The Effect of the Subject in the Psychoses From: From the Symptom to the Fantasy and Back , Chapter XXIV Jacques-Alain Miller Translated and edited byEllie Ragland and Anne Pulis   - φ The case of the Wolf childOf the subject as a response of the realThe choice of psychosisThe last time I stopped at a precise reference from one of Lacan's écrits , the very last paragraphs of the Ecrits  on page !! I invitedyou to refer to that passage before this course, because the volume'sconclusion bears on the relationships #e shall define of the subject andof the concept promised by the psychoanalytic discourse, that is theconcept of the phallusIt is promised in a #ay that implies a certain e$uivalence bet#een thet#o %t the point #here #e can #rite the e$uivalence as a problem & thise$uivalence of the barred subject and the symbol &  & it permits us totae note of castration as that #hich has the value of impotence on theimaginary planeThis $uestion preoccupies us for a precise reason It has a clinicalconse$uence, notably, the incidence or degree of occurrence of thesubject in the psychosesThis is a point that al#ays maintains its popularity in Lacan'steaching( The position of the subject in the analytic e)perience islined to his or her rapport to the phallic signifier *ou find thetrace of this from the beginning to the end of Lacan's teaching+ firstin his écrit,   On a question preliminary to any possible treatment of  psychosis  and in the schema , #here it is pinned under the imaginarysignifier of the phallus and given as essential to the correctstructuration of the subject One can #rite it thus & - φ  It is almost#ritten that #ay in On a $uestion preliminary, 1  e)cept that at this date, Lacan does not yet bar the  of thesubject, in the same #ay that he does not negativi.e the imaginaryphallus - φ  Then you have set forth in his te)t of /0!1, Etourdit , a indof transformation of the value given in this initial rapport given inthe last écrit #hose scope #as large There are certainly other écrits by Lacan after#ards 2ut they do not have the same richness, #hether itbe Television  or the te)ts of Scilicet  %fter that one, one no longerhas the same maring-out of the ensemble of the 3reudian 3ield In Etourdit  #e have a transformation of the formula #ritten thus, & -) &,#here the same necessity reverberates The subject in psychoanalysisonly taes on his or her value & #hich means situatable & from his orher inscription as an argument The argument lies in #hat is #rittenthere as a phallic function, in the sense of a propositional function There are many roads from one formula to the other, but the sameconstraint is al#ays reflected, the obligation #e are under to situatethe subject in reference to the phallus 4any have the completely erroneous idea that one can go directly totreat the Other This is impossible, but this error cannot mae usforget that the subject #hich surges forth at this point is a miracleI am using this term by borro#ing, less from theology, than fromchreber, #hen he evoes his miracle of ho#ling It is the miracle that,by addressing oneself to the real from the symbolic, the real ans#ersIt is, ho#ever, the $uestion that this definition of Lacan's poses to us & in the mode of an ans#er & #hich has remained enigmatic up until no#+that the subject is a response of the real There are many otherdefinitions of the subject, but it is to this one that #e arrive no#This phrase is in its complete form( The subject as an effect of signification is a response of the real 2efore evoing it myself at 4ontpellier, I heard it from 5ric Laurent'smouth, #ho is also creating material out of it, #ho mentioned it in thecourse of his intervention ince I could articulate some things myselfhe said at 4ontpellier here, I proposed to him to sum up hisintervention here 6e has, indeed, been #illing to accept, and one isgoing to hear him until the end of this course 7e)t #ee, I #ill taeup this matter again for my partThus, I pass the #ord to him, precisely in starting from this pointThis $uestion becomes crucial #hen it is a matter of the psychoses 3romthat moment on & #hy not eep the symbol #hich is found in the 2* Obs. Sandra, daqui em diante fala o Eric Laurent.  Preliminary question  & the phallus in $uestion in psychosis can beinde)ed by a small .ero & 8 9onse$uently, the position of the subjectin the psychoses becomes problematicI approach this in a very abstract #ay, from these small symbols%ny#ay, it is the root of #hat maes one $uestion the subject in thepsychoses We must tae care to assure that the psychoses be approachedas an affair of the subject in particular That is #hy, in particular,#e shall continue to spea of the fantasy in the $uestion of thepsychoses In these fe# conclusive paragraphs of the Ecrits , this rapport of thesubject and the phallus is put into place in a #ay that must have beenperceptible precisely for giving its value to the division of thesubject Lacan this by going from the position of thesubject to the place of the phallus6e taes it up again very classically & Let us remember here !reud rolls it out  & at a place #hich he calls the not-point of the divisionof the subject It is on this lac of the mother#s penis here thenature of the phallus is revealed   & I am not insisting on thedifference bet#een the organ and the signifier there( I am continuing toread this passage & The subject is divided here, !reud tells us, at the place of reality   This division is presentified to us from t#o clinicalcategories :apparently, in any case;, phobia and perversion & seeing open up there, at the same time, the gulf against hich a phobia illdefend itself, and, on the other hand, recovering it from this surfacehere he ill erect the fetish, that is to say, the e$istence of the penis as maintained, although displaced  If #e #ant to represent it to ourselves here, #e must, indeed, start#ith the lac that differentiates phobia and perversion The first,phobia, erects as a rampart, a signifier that can do anything 2y this,the subject protects him or herself, guaranteeing a sense of beingagainst #hat opens up as an abyss from maternal castration This ispresentified to us in Little 6ans's phobia by the signifier horse  6euses this signifier for doing everything, especially for defendinghimself as subject from the abyss #hich has opened up for him While,from the other side & the perverse version of this defense &, the objectcovers up this abyssThis is a rene#al of #hat #e have seen from %lcibiades's perspectivefrom him as desiring at the end of the Subversion of the subject  6e ispresented as desiring in such a #ay, there, that it is a $uestion of thenormal perversion of desire What maes this perversion clinical, is#hen one identifies #ith the fetish erected, succeeds in recuperatingthe imaginary phallus, in other #ords, in such a #ay that this phallus & the partner's phallus & becomes the very condition of his desire for aman I shall not insist, since it is not the point at #hich I #ant toarrive On the one side  & Lacan says & let us e$tract the %no& from the%no penis&, to 'be( put beteen parentheses, in order to transfer it tothe not) noledge, hich is the hesitation step of neurosis  This sideis the side that proceeds from the phobia, a reading #hich is confirmedfor us from the conclusion of the Subversion of the subject  #hich 3  opposes neurosis and desiring< !rom the other   & that is to say, fromthis desiring position &, let us recogni*e the efficacity of the subjectin this gnomon he erects for himself to designate the point of truth atany hour   & That is #here I #ould lie to dra# your attention & < +evealing from the phallus itself that it is nothing other than this point of lac that it indicates in the subject It is almost the lasttruth that Lacan's Ecrits  deliver If it is nothing more than a$uestion, there, of #hat is revealed, thans to this side, it is,nonetheless, given as the definition of the phallus The phallus isnothing other than the point of lac that it indicates in the subjectThis formulation is, at first glance, parado)ical, for the reason that#e differentiate the inde) and the reference If I sho# something #ithmy finger, there must be a distance from #hat I am designating That isho# #e function & from the difference bet#een the inde) and thereferenceWhat is implied by Lacan's definition here is that, #hen it is a$uestion of the phallus in psychoanalysis, one is dealing #ith inde) andreference at the same time This implies that the phallus is nothingother than the point of lac it indicates in the subject That isredoubled from this complication+ that the reference in $uestion is,moreover, a reference #hich is lacing =efinitively speaing, in other#ords, the inde) is nothing other than this reference, and, moreover, itlacs Lacan does not unfold this idea in this definition 6e unfolds itin his last écrit  of importance or of a certain fullness, by maing ofthe phallic function the supplement of the se)ual rapport that is not6e ends up naming the lac of a reference in the a)iom( There is nose$ual rapport 2ut I must indicate at this point #hat the gnomon  is /  It is a 5uclidiangeometric concept #hich you can for yourselves very simply designate Wecan, for e)ample, construct the gnomon of the s$uareWe trace a s$uare The elementary construction #hich can be producedfrom this s$uare consists of tracing a diagonal of the s$uare andprolonging it by erecting the diagonal It is this diagonal #hichcounts, because it is in itself already an inde) This diagonal is notthe gnomon, but #hat permits one to construct the gnomon It is theprinciple of the inde) of the sundial #hich, in order to function, canbe found at a right angle on the hori.on The geometric gnomon isconstructed on the basis of this inde) To construct it, it suffices toprolong or elevate the sides of the s$uare 6aving e)tended them, youtrace the parallels, first on the side of the s$uare that isperpendicular to the sides you have e)tended *ou lo#er it on thediagonal That stands out if you also e)tend this side in three parts#hich are t#o rectangles and a s$uare It is a general principle ofconstruction since, of course, if you select another point of thediagonal, you can construct that indefinitely on the support of thisdiagonal Thus, #hat 5uclid calls the gnomon  is valid for anyparallelogram, not only for a s$uare 6e designates as gnomon #hicheverone of the parallelograms is described around the diagonal #ith its t#ocompliments This means that the gnomon , in its proper sense, is thiss$uare, if you #ant, #ith the t#o complements, follo#ing this e)ample, 4
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks